I agree with Jeanne's suggestions - and also with Martin!
These will be great (and long overdue) improvements.

Cheers,
Adam

On 9/27/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perfect.
>
> With these additions and some more detailed skinning of the table
> paging and sorting, we might get rid of the +/- statement about
> "design" for Trinidad at http://www.jsfmatrix.net.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 9/27/07, Jeanne Waldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >  Cristi Toth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  I've done some work on the tree renderer in Trinidad
> >  I added the connecting lines, like in Tomahawk (or any other tree) behind
> > the expanded/collapsed icon (-, +)
> >  I now have 5 skin-selectors for the tree:
> >
> >  af|tree::expanded-icon
> >  af|tree::collapsed-icon
> >  - these are the [-], [+] icons
> >
> >  af|tree::line-icon - this one is the vertical line
> >  af|tree::line-middle-icon - this one is the horizontal line for each entry
> > (used in the back of the expanded/collapsed icon)
> >  af|tree::line-last-icon - this one is like the one above, but it is used in
> > the case of the last sibling (the corner)
> >
> >  now some questions:
> >
> >  1) should I add a 'renderLines' attribute to the 'tree' component to
> > enable/disable the lines ?
> >  I would make this a skin property, not a per instance component property.
> > Something like:
> >  af|tree { -tr-render-lines: true}
> >
> >
> >  2) should I let the lines be skinnable and add them to the base skin?
> >  it's up to you. Showing/hiding them with the skin property probably is
> > enough.
> >
> >
> >  3) if I let them be skinnable, then should I ommit the 'renderLines' attr
> > and let the user just override the line icons with blank ones?
> >  again, I think this should be a skin property.
> >
> >
> >
> >  Next, I worked on the TreeTable renderer. I made the 'Expand All / Collapse
> > All' links skinnable.
> >
> >  1. should I move the the 'Expand All / Collapse All' links on the first row
> > and get rid of the 2nd ?
> >  It seems quite useless to have 2 rows
> >  not sure what you mean.
> >
> >
> >  2. should I also make the focus link 'X' skinnable (it looks kind of lame
> > right now) ?
> >  sure. I'm surprised it isn't already.
> >
> >
> >  3. should I add some attributes for disabling the focus column and the
> > breadCrumbs, for people who don't need them?
> >
> >  4. I noticed a bug in the row banding, it's not correctly rendered, I
> > suppose it would be nice if I fix it...
> >
> >  You can see here a pictures with the results of what I did until now:
> >  http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/tree_skinning.png
> >
> >  Is this welcomed by you guys?
> >  I like it.
> >
> >
> >  regards,
> >  --
> >  Cristi Toth
> >
> >  -------------
> >  Codebeat
> >  www.codebeat.ro
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>

Reply via email to