I guess due to legacy ? The current Tomahawk TileViewHandler has dependency to struts-tiles...
I was agreeing with the point of Mario, that a tomahawk component has to work with JSP in any case. That doesn't mean, we really can't add Facelets in there... kind of optional. I really don't care much on that. The Tiles2 is more interesting for me: -Tiles1 was supported -Tiles2 has been requested -M On 10/30/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we can put Tiles2 dependencies into Tomahawk, why not put facelets > code directly into Tomahawk? > > On 10/30/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If nobody care, I'll put it into sandbox. > > > > Thx, > > Matthias > > > > On 10/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > regarding TOMAHAWK-1115 ([1]), do we want to support it inside of > > > Tomahawk, or the sandbox ? > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1115 > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
