Yep, KIFS - Keep It Flat and Simple.
For the same reason we should not put the Facelets project under
tomahawk - even though it may have tomahawk in its name. With the
projects names Manfred proposed this is easily possible.
Ciao,
Mario
Scott O'Bryan schrieb:
Yeah, and I don't know what's going to happen with the RCF project,
guess it's up to the community to decide, but I don't see why it needs
to be a subproject of Trinidad so much as a subproject of MyFaces with
a dependency on Trinidad. :) Most all of it's dependencies are on
API packages in Trinidad and I imagine that any impl dependencies
would have to be resolved anyway.
Scott
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
2. Following some old discussion, we don't know if extra components
libaries are going to stay as MyFaces subprojects forever. For
instance, when RCF get out of incubation, it might be strange to
have a subsubproject of MyFaces since RCF is a subproject of
Trinidad. If we can get a nice modular infrastructure including only
renderkit independent at first, but then adding some optional module
for PPR, skinning and such, then we could move to a TLP and have
Tomahawk, Tobago, Trinidad and RCF be simple subprojects all
depending only on that new common library. Hopefully, it would also
ensure perfect interoperability between all of them at the same time.
I have no plans to ever move TLP with anything I do here in MyFaces
land, I feel very comfortable under the MyFaces umbrella and I also
do not understand (yet) why we should leave.
MyFaces = [EMAIL PROTECTED] - IMHO that should be the direction. Maybe we
have to split the ML later on, but that is another story.
Ciao,
Mario
