Hi! > I don't think a separation between api and impl jars is useful. > I second that. For the same reasons. It makes things unnecessary complicated .... To ensure api stability community review should be enough - and then there is a maven plugin for that, no?
BTW: I thought we agreed on a structure like myfaces-jsfcommons-converters myfaces-jsfcommons-validators ... Also overly complex, but something I can learn to understand .... Lets reiterate: I prefer to start with a simple jsfcommons project where we have no faces-config.xml (at least not in a place where JSF loads it automatically). Providing a jsfcommons-faces-config.xml which the user has to add to the configuration will avoid any side-effect when dropping in our jsfcommons jar. It also allows to selectively active things as the users can change their own configuration as required. Regarding the sandbox: I'd like to suggest to use the tomahawk sandbox for myfaces land at all. Lets promote the tomahawk-sandbox one level higher - thats it. Ciao, Mario
