I did a better version of the tiles-integration for tomahawk (also works with Tiles2 now).
regards, Martin On 12/6/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 6, 2007 4:50 PM, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul, > > > > That's good to hear. > > > > There's a lot more value that just the testing framework FWIW. I think > we've > > discussed this already. > > ya, we did > > > > > Honestly, I think the best thing to do is let Shale continue to exist for > > the time being and move relevant portions into MyFaces, either as separate > > subprojects (such as test and dialog) or pieces of other projects. > > Annotations and Remoting could be part of Tomahawk or common, and the > > ViewController could be part of Orchestra. > > I summarized today the same bits, makes sense to me. > I'd prefer to see Orchestra's ViewController the one we use :) > > > > > (Not sure about the Tiles integration stuff.) > we don't need that > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action > > http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring > > http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Paul Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:59 AM > > > To: MyFaces Development > > > Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces > > > > > > > > Matthias, > > > I made this same request, in addition to moving parts or all of Shale > > > into MyFaces, to Wendy Smoak at ApacheCon in Atlanta. She said that > > > she > > > would look into it. > > > > > > Paul Spencer > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > >>> It was discussed, that Shale should have a final release; > > > >>> I am +1 on that. > > > >>> > > > >> <snip/> > > > >> > > > >> What do you have in mind, other than cutting the release? I may be > > > >> able to help with the release (depends when etc.). v1.0.5 or v1.1.0 > > > or > > > >> both? > > > > > > > > it was now a while, since the last release; and a release > > > > (1.0.5 and 1.1.0 IMO) is needed. > > > > > > > > What happens after such a release? > > > > I don't know. Shale is quite now, besides > > > > some committs, that you do :-) > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> I am not sure, if all modules should really make it into MyFaces. > > > >>> I can see interest in these Shale-modules: > > > >>> -Dialog > > > >>> -Remoting > > > >>> -Test > > > >>> -Tiger > > > >>> -ViewController > > > >>> > > > >>> What happens to the rest? > > > >>> I don't know; > > > >>> Will they be maintained ? > > > >>> I don't know; > > > >>> > > > >> <snap/> > > > >> > > > >> I intend to remain involved with the dialog modules, at the least. > > > > > > > > nice to hear. I have no problem with making the Shale committers > > > MyFaces > > > > committers. Some are already. > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > >> -Rahul > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
