On Jan 21, 2008 1:08 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If something was publicly released as 1.2.1 already, then -- even if > it was pulled -- please do not release 1.2.1 again.
it wasn't released. Just the impl jars made it to public repo. which is (from the effect) close to a release ;-) -M > > Skipping a version number might cause some questions on the list. > However, reusing a version number will result in the end user not > knowing if they have the "good version" or the "bad version", nor will > anyone who tries to help them debug issues. > > > On Jan 21, 2008 4:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So we agree on 1.2.2? > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
