I am all for 1.2.2 - if someone downloaded the 1.2.1, he'll be confused - releasing 1.2.2, we spare everyone the potential confusion. It is highly normal to skip a point-release, that's really not a problem, I would think.
I thought that was already the outcome of the discussion on the dev-list, as I understood it. regards, Martin On Jan 21, 2008 10:31 PM, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because artifacts where published, even if that was not the intent, the > version number should be consider used. > > Paul Spencer > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2008 1:08 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If something was publicly released as 1.2.1 already, then -- even if > >> it was pulled -- please do not release 1.2.1 again. > > > > it wasn't released. Just the impl jars made it to public repo. > > which is (from the effect) close to a release ;-) > > > > -M > > > >> Skipping a version number might cause some questions on the list. > >> However, reusing a version number will result in the end user not > >> knowing if they have the "good version" or the "bad version", nor will > >> anyone who tries to help them debug issues. > >> > >> > >> On Jan 21, 2008 4:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> So we agree on 1.2.2? > >>> > > > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
