lol... Do you feel we are better served by integrating this into current or current12?
Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote: > > welcome tree3; > > > > On Feb 4, 2008 8:20 PM, Matt Tyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Great! >> >> I've got some things to figure out in bringing this into Tomahawk. I >> use >> an AjaxComponent strategy as described in this article: >> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-2007/jw-12-ajaxcomponent.html. >> >> That means using an ajax phase listener, so I've got to figure out how to >> integrate this in. It looks like there is already an AjaxListener in >> Tomahawk sandbox (as well as a couple interfaces I use, AjaxComponent and >> AjaxRenderer). >> >> I'm planning on integrating into the Sandbox and uploading the patch. >> Sound >> ok? >> >> It's a new component, not a revision of Tree2. >> >> Thanks, >> Matt >> >> >> >> >> Mario Ivankovits wrote: >> > >> > Matt Tyson schrieb: >> >> I've got a Tree component that handles node expansions via Ajax. What >> do >> >> you >> >> think the interest would be in having this donated to Tomahawk? >> >> >> > I'd say: Yes! >> > >> > Is it an all new component or did you enhance tree2? >> > >> > If you could open a jira ticket and add a patch so that we can see the >> > technical details it would be great. >> > >> > Ciao, >> > Mario >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Interest-in-an-AjaxTree-tp15258543p15275226.html >> >> Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Interest-in-an-AjaxTree-tp15258543p15276165.html Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
