On Feb 5, 2008 9:59 AM, Gerald Müllan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just that you can't have this ajaxed-node-fetching which would be really > > a nice feature I often whished to have. > > Yes, you can put tree2 in a ppr group (which I already did), but you > > have to fetch the whole tree in node toggling, no? > > Yes, that`s right. The whole tree has to be embedded inside ppr. > Never tried ajax4jsf, but i think it must be the same approach.
why bother with that? Isn't ajax4jsf doing things like: <ajaxEnabled/>; <ajaxRegion /> I doubt, that adding tags for treating ajax as a special case is the right way. > > So, updating only the affected node would be indeed a very nice feature. +1 (instead of replacing the complete DOM for the entire tree, right?) > > best regards, > > Gerald > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
