Hi! > Hi, I like the approach. I am not very keen in "annotated" javadocs > (which is error prone IMO) but that is just fine and I would say a > better alternative to the XMLs (which are rather error prone too). > However, it would be nice to have the builder library generic enough > so we could use javadocs now and later have an alternative that uses > real JDK5 annotations for whoever prefers that approach. Same for me!
> Thanks for the good work! +1 I like what Simon did too. I hope we can switch over to that soon. Ciao, Mario
