We definitely need the same for library suite demos for trinidad and tomahawk.
Compared to other libs' demos like richfaces or icefaces, our example projects doesn't look attractive. Cagatay On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, that would be most helpful I think.. Once again, good work. > > Scott > > Catalin Kormos wrote: > > Sure, that will be changed. On the current website the publish date is > > displayed the, i think we can leave it like that, right? > > > > regards, > > Catalin > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > I do have another followup comment. At the top of the page is a > > "version"... This makes total sense if we are navigating a project > > (like MyFaces core) but it makes less sense if the content is being > > retrieved from a source tree that doesn't have any releases (like > the > > MyFaces and Portlet Bridge "site" projects). Is that version tag > part > > of a site template? If so, I would say that when not navigating a > > project, this should be blank. > > > > Scott > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > > +1 from me. Excellent work. > > > > > > I also wouldn't mind switching to XDOC for the Download pages on > the > > > portlet bridge if we have to, but I'd want to move the MyFaces > > > downloads page as well. It's far to easy to do a "cut and > > paste" over > > > the new "release" block. If we don't do this, I'm okay with the > > > limitations of APT regardless. > > > > > > Catalin Kormos wrote: > > >> I would like to ask for your opinion before starting to commit > the > > >> new MyFaces Maven skin (based on the designs Adonis provided). > > Please > > >> have a look at [1] for a quick preview, it's not the entire > > website, > > >> so most of the links don't work, but most of the elements that > have > > >> been customized can be seen. It's a bit different from what > > you can > > >> see at [2], on which the community agreed on, mainly because > > there is > > >> not much / not at all freedom available for customizing the > > markup of > > >> the sections in the main content. Also you can notice a > difference > > >> between some tables (for example between the ones on the > downloads > > >> page and the ones on the mailing lists page), as tables generated > > >> from an APT doc, don't render <th> elements, but from XDoc docs > > they > > >> are available (the XDoc format is much more flexible here, and in > > >> general); the next release of Maven Doxia, as far as i've seen, > > will > > >> fix the issue with the headers. > > >> > > >> If you don't find anything in particular wrong and you agree > > that we > > >> can live with these small issues for a while, i will apply the > new > > >> skin over all the projects, and add new logos where we have (for > > >> example for the Portlet Bridge project). > > >> > > >> [1] > > http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/myfaces/website/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/> > > >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/> > > >> [2] > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png<http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png> > > < > http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png > > > > >> > > < > http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png > > > > >> > > >> > > >> regards, > > >> Catalin > > >> > > >> ------------ > > >> Codebeat > > >> www.codebeat.ro <http://www.codebeat.ro> <http://www.codebeat.ro> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ------------ > > Codebeat > > www.codebeat.ro <http://www.codebeat.ro> > >
