Definitely a next step, but that shouldn't prevent the website makeovers from continuing IMO. Skinning Trinidad demo to look like this is a project in and of itself. :)

Scott

Catalin Kormos wrote:
Well, i couldn't agree more, sounds good for a next step.

regards,
Catalin

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Ernst Fastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    +1 from me

    our demos may functually be complete but almost all other
    component vendors
    enhance the "user experience" in their demos greatly by proper design

    also looks better in presentations

    I think we would attract more users with nicer CSS in the demos

    Ernst

    On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Cagatay Civici
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
    > We definitely need the same for library suite demos for trinidad and
    > tomahawk.
    >
    > Compared to other libs' demos like richfaces or icefaces, our
    example
    > projects doesn't look attractive.
    >
    > Cagatay
    >
    >
    >
    > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Scott O'Bryan
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
    > > Yeah, that would be most helpful I think..  Once again, good work.
    > >
    > > Scott
    > >
    > >
    > > Catalin Kormos wrote:
    > > > Sure, that will be changed. On the current website the
    publish date is
    > > > displayed the, i think we can leave it like that, right?
    > > >
    > > > regards,
    > > > Catalin
    > > >
    > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Scott O'Bryan
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
    wrote:
    > > >
    > > >     I do have another followup comment.  At the top of the
    page is a
    > > >     "version"...  This makes total sense if we are
    navigating a project
    > > >     (like MyFaces core) but it makes less sense if the
    content is being
    > > >     retrieved from a source tree that doesn't have any
    releases (like
    > the
    > > >     MyFaces and Portlet Bridge "site" projects).  Is that
    version tag
    > part
    > > >     of a site template?  If so, I would say that when not
    navigating a
    > > >     project, this should be blank.
    > > >
    > > >     Scott
    > > >
    > > >     Scott O'Bryan wrote:
    > > >     > +1 from me.  Excellent work.
    > > >     >
    > > >     > I also wouldn't mind switching to XDOC for the
    Download pages on
    > the
    > > >     > portlet bridge if we have to, but I'd want to move the
    MyFaces
    > > >     > downloads page as well.  It's far to easy to do a "cut and
    > > >     paste" over
    > > >     > the new "release" block.  If we don't do this, I'm
    okay with the
    > > >     > limitations of APT regardless.
    > > >     >
    > > >     > Catalin Kormos wrote:
    > > >     >> I would like to ask for your opinion before starting
    to commit
    > the
    > > >     >> new MyFaces Maven skin (based on the designs Adonis
    provided).
    > > >     Please
    > > >     >> have a look at [1] for a quick preview, it's not the
    entire
    > > >     website,
    > > >     >> so most of the links don't work, but most of the
    elements that
    > have
    > > >     >> been customized can be seen.  It's a bit different
    from what
    > > >     you can
    > > >     >> see at [2], on which the community agreed on, mainly
    because
    > > >     there is
    > > >     >> not much / not at all freedom available for
    customizing the
    > > >     markup of
    > > >     >> the sections in the main content. Also you can notice a
    > difference
    > > >     >> between some tables (for example between the ones on the
    > downloads
    > > >     >> page and the ones on the mailing lists page), as
    tables generated
    > > >     >> from an APT doc, don't render <th> elements, but from
    XDoc docs
    > > >     they
    > > >     >> are available (the XDoc format is much more flexible
    here, and in
    > > >     >> general); the next release of Maven Doxia, as far as
    i've seen,
    > > >     will
    > > >     >> fix the issue with the headers.
    > > >     >>
    > > >     >> If you don't find anything in particular wrong and
    you agree
    > > >     that we
    > > >     >> can live with these small issues for a while, i will
    apply the
    > new
    > > >     >> skin over all the projects, and add new logos where
    we have (for
    > > >     >> example for the Portlet Bridge project).
    > > >     >>
    > > >     >> [1]
    http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/myfaces/website/
    <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/>
    > > >     <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/>
    > > >     >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/>
    > > >     >> [2]
    > > >     >>
    > > >
    >
    http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png
    <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png>
    > > >
    >
    <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png>
    > > >     >>
    > > >
    >
    <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png>
    > > >     >>
    > > >     >>
    > > >     >> regards,
    > > >     >> Catalin
    > > >     >>
    > > >     >> ------------
    > > >     >> Codebeat
    > > >     >> www.codebeat.ro <http://www.codebeat.ro>
    <http://www.codebeat.ro> <http://www.codebeat.ro>
    > > >     >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > ------------
    > > > Codebeat
    > > > www.codebeat.ro <http://www.codebeat.ro>
    <http://www.codebeat.ro>
    > >
    > >
    >
    >




--
------------
Codebeat
www.codebeat.ro <http://www.codebeat.ro>

Reply via email to