IE 8 not 3. Was still thinking FF3.

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that approx 50% of firefox users use 1.5 and the other
>  50% use 2, about 0% use FF3. No one is on IE 3 yet. (not counting
>  developers)
>
>  -Andrew
>
>
>
>  On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I like Matt's idea personally.
>  >
>  >  Scott
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  Andrew Robinson wrote:
>  >
>  > > So use @agent with the new version support in the skin? FF3, IE8 -
>  > > rounded - FF2, IE7 squared (I can't speak to Opera and Safari since I
>  > > have never used them)?
>  > >
>  > > Would take a long time for people to used these browsers, but it would
>  > > dramatically increase performance (much less HTML bulk). I am not
>  > > sure, would like to hear what others think.
>  > >
>  > > -Andrew
>  > >
>  > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > > Hey Andrew,
>  > > >
>  > > >  How about just using the CSS3 rounded corner styles already available
>  > > >  in Firefox and Safari?  Of course we'd fall back into square corners
>  > > >  in IE.
>  > > >
>  > > >  -Matt
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Robinson
>  > > >  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > >  > Looking at the many of the renderers for Trinidad components I do 
> not
>  > > >  >  see a lot of skinning selectors that would enable rounded corners.
>  > For
>  > > >  >  example, the panelTabbed has some nice selectors for the tabs, but
>  > > >  >  only one selector for the body, so it would not be possible to 
> round
>  > > >  >  the body corners, only the tabs themselves.
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >  Is this something we want to address for the new myfaces skin or
>  > > >  >  should we just sacrifice LnF for performance at the moment and keep
>  > > >  >  the corners square and no drop shadows or other nice effects?
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >  -Andrew
>  > > >  >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>

Reply via email to