I'd prefer a Spanish word...
To me checker sounds stupid.
(krasser checker...)
-M
Sent from my iPod.
Am 11.05.2008 um 01:55 schrieb "Gerhard Petracek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
@andrew:
it depends on the mother tongue. ;)
for some of you 'seven' sounds boring - especially if english is
your mother tongue.
words of foreign languages sound much more interesting.
if i translate 'seven' into my mother tongue, it also sounds a bit
boring (just because it isn't exotic for me).
in my country it's a kind of "trend" to use english words.
so maybe we should just use an "invented" name or an acronym.
e.g.:
jac (java annotation checker)
jack (java annotation checker)
if you translate e.g. 'jack' into my mother tongue, there are a lot
of different meanings.
so there is no real meaning - it just sounds interesting (it's a
matter of taste).
regards,
gerhard
2008/5/10 Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Some spanish words:
myfaces-commons-validacion
myfaces-commons-validar
myfaces-commons-validador
myfaces-commons-valide
myfaces-commons-evaluador
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
+1 for myfaces-commons-checker.
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
do you have a further suggestion?
maybe a bit more fancy?
e.g. one of the suggestions i heard is:
myfaces-commons-checker
maybe it's a new starting point for further suggestions.
regards,
gerhard
2008/4/29 Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
How about "convalidi". It's validate in Italian (I think).
Gerhard Petracek wrote:
hello scott,
do you have a suggestion for a short and fancy name?
regards,
gerhard
2008/4/27 Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>:
+1 to not naming it validations. There is already a commons
validator.
-0 to including core in the name
Strong -1 to including JSR in the project name. A jar is nearly
an enhancement number for java. You wouln't name your project
something like MyFaces-1234 after a Jira ticket number.
On Apr 26, 2008, at 10:25 AM, "Gerhard Petracek"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
hello alexander,
i got your idea.
however, i hope we will find a short and fancy name.
if we don't have 'core' within the name, i think we have to find
something else than just 'validation'.
otherwise it will be a bit confusing for users due to the fact
that the core itself doesn't validate.
concrete validation logic is located within the
independent/optional modules.
the target is to have a core which provides the infrastructure
and which encapsulates the specifics of the jsf version.
furthermore, the core is independent of specific annotations. the
optional modules provide the concrete annotations and/or
validation logic (independent of the jsf version).
(reason for and/or: we don't provide the annotations of jpa nor
of jsr 303 - we just provide the validation strategies for these
external annotations.)
@myfaces-commons-validation-annotations:
it isn't a pure annotation module - it also provides the
validation strategies and much more.
(in the case of the jpa validation support it just provides the
validation strategy.)
moreover, i would suggest that we rename seven-validation to
seven-ext-validation or a bit shorter: seven-extval (for extended
validation)
or something similar which indicates that these are our
annotations (and so on).
@myfaces-commons-validation-jsr303:
i'm fine with both jsr303 (my original suggestion) or bean-
validation
the names of our compromise so far:
myfaces-commons-[new name]
(= the core)
myfaces-commons-[new name]-validation
(= our annotations + validation strategies incl. cross-component
validation infrastructure and also the jpa validation strategy,...)
myfaces-commons-[new name]-bean-validation
(= the infrastructure and validation strategies to support jsr 303)
fancy suggestions for [new name] are welcome.
(we need some suggestions to open a vote.)
or what's about something different
it isn't my favourite - however, it might be an impulse for other
suggestions.
e.g.:
myfaces-commons-validation-core
myfaces-commons-validation-extval
myfaces-commons-validation-jsr303 (or bean-validation)
(i prefer an independent name.)
regards,
gerhard
2008/4/25 Jesse Alexander (KSFH 336)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
we are getting side-tracked...
let's find a name within this thread! :)
validation ?
->
myfaces-commons-validation
myfaces-commons-validation-annotations (was -validation)
myfaces-commons-validation-jsr303 (was bean-validation)
kind regards
Alexander
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
--
Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
