+0 I would only like to see another subproject added under the myfaces umbrella if there is enough developer critical mass willing to develop and maintain it and it is not a one-man job. Otherwise, this one could be a nice addition.
Cheers, Bruno 2008/6/3 Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I agree with Jihoon here 100%. > > I think this would be a great addition to MyFaces. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action > http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring > http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info > phone: +1 203-653-2989 > fax: +1 203-653-2988 > > * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! > http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jihoon Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 1:00 PM >> To: MyFaces Development >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] To have MyFaces Alchemy as a subproject >> >> Okay, since Flash is ubiquitous and freely available, I did not expect >> issues regarding support of Flash [only of Flex which has been open >> sourced through MPL]. As mentioned by Grant in the below post, Apache >> has projects that supports PDF and Excel [which too are ubiquitous >> with the second one having a fee], so don't know why Flash is an issue >> to be supported by Apache. >> >> One additional note that I did not wish to bring up previously when >> this debate began is, why has Apache actually supported the Java >> language when it was proprietary to Sun? I mean under the statement >> that Apache should only promote open source tools, then it should have >> used other language that was not owned by a specific company. >> >> That's my thought regarding this issue. >> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> I'm still voting -1 on having a flash-based project within MyFaces >> >> unless someone can show that this code works with a non-proprietory >> >> Flash player. >> > >> > I doubt that. >> > >> >> >> >> I'd be happy to see this project succeed, but not here at Apache. >> This >> >> foundation exists to promote open source software, not provide >> wrappers >> >> for proprietory tools. >> > >> > true. >> > on the incubator list was not much interested in that project as >> well. >> > perhaps google code or codehaus may be the right place ? >> > >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Simon >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > further stuff: >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely, >> >> Ji Hoon Kim > >
