On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Leonardo, > > the commons project is not only for validators and converterts, > but for all kind of renderkit independent jsf (tools/utils/...). >
yup. I don't know why we always have to clarify that... To me this is clear ;-) > the missing of a suitable commons submodule could not be a reason. > > imho a commons-tools could be a possible module for the > exporterActionListener component. > > and there is also a 1.1 branch in commons, so not 1.2 compatiblitiy > could not a problem. > > > Regards, > Volker > > > 2008/6/6 Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> The actual layout of myfaces-commons is this: >> >> myfaces-commons-validators >> myfaces-commons-converters >> myfaces-commons-utils >> >> There is no a project like: >> >> myfaces-commons-listeners >> >> myfaces-commons is tied to 1.2, so if some converter or validator is in >> tomahawk 1.1, on tomahawk 1.2 this should be referred to myfaces-commons >> (makes easy for existing tomahawk user upgrade and do not change their >> current pages). In this case myfaces-commons should be a dependency for >> tomahawk. >> >> According to the intention of several developers, there are things of >> tomahawk that it should be on its own submodule (dojo components by example, >> converters and validators) and others in tomahawk. This issues were not be >> discussed yet, so if this is in tomahawk there is no prob. >> >> +1 >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Volker, >>> >>> I have a future plan of extending the functionality of this component to >>> make it aware of the current displayed Tomahawk dataTable page. >>> I mean, the generated reports will be aware of Tomahawk related classes. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> any reason to move this to tomahawk and not into commons? >>>> >>>> Are there any dependencies to tomahawk or a specific renderkit? >>>> >>>> I had not looked into, but if this is what it sounds like : >>>> A actionListener which could added to any UICommand component, >>>> which renders binary data from a UIData component, >>>> than there is no reason to add this to a html-renderkit library. >>>> >>>> -1 in this case for tomahawk. >>>> -0 otherwise >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Volker >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2008/6/5 Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> > Hi Team, >>>> > >>>> > After integration the pdfExport and the excelExport components into the >>>> > exporterActionListener component, >>>> > improving its syntax and completing its documentation. >>>> > >>>> > I wish to promote this component to the next Tomahawk release. >>>> > >>>> > [+1] for agreeing with promoting the component to the next Tomahawk >>>> > release. >>>> > [-1] for disagreeing with promoting the component to the next Tomahawk >>>> > release. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks all very much! >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed >>>> > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> inexso - information exchange solutions GmbH >>>> Bismarckstraße 13 | 26122 Oldenburg >>>> Tel.: +49 441 4082 356 | >>>> FAX: +49 441 4082 355 | www.inexso.de >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed >>> http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog >> > > > > -- > inexso - information exchange solutions GmbH > Bismarckstraße 13 | 26122 Oldenburg > Tel.: +49 441 4082 356 | > FAX: +49 441 4082 355 | www.inexso.de > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
