> I don't particularly like this structure. I bet 80% of trinidad 1.2.x users > don't notice this extra link and go to pages with wrong information for > their version. It's also makes trinidad 1.2.x a "second class citizen", with > trinidad 1.1.x appearing to be the "main" product. Which seems backwards to > me; shouldn't the emphasis be on the most recent version? And the more time > goes by, the less appropriate this website structure will be....
:-) it isn't that hard to change, but wasn't bothering me that much. If time comes... ;-) > > I suppose as a temporary measure, Tomahawk could be set up the same. It is > certainly the least work. But it doesn't seem right long-term. > > If people don't like having the 1.x and 2.x lines as top-level entries in > the myfaces.apache.org page, then how about creating a new "site" module at > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/ > which can then hold info common to both the tomahawk subprojects? > > Have the "site" module link to the two tomahawk variants (presumably 3 > variants when jsf2.0 is released). And then link the main site to that. > Whatever gets done, it would be nice not to break existing links/bookmarks > unless there is a good reason to... > > Regards, Simon > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
