Hi Scott, Mike
I updated PORTLETBRIDGE-48
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-48
with information about the origin of the call to
setRequestCharacterEncoding().
Hth, Felix
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Wow. for some reason it truncated by response. Here it is again..
Good catch Felix, I think this is going to have to wait till the next
release (and I'm hoping we'll have it in main soon - Mike can speak more
to this).
Here is the issue. The intention of Alpha-3 is to conform to the public
review of the JSR-301 spec. The next release will incorporate changes
regarding the feedback we've had from the review period - including this
issue. Reading the bug, Mike indicated that this change needed to be
added to the spec and is not a simple implementation detail.
Mike, I don't recall what the resolution was from the EG on this issue.
Do we have it resolved? If so, do we have an ETA on when this can be
moved into main?
Scott
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Good catch Felix, I think this is going to have to wait till the
next release (and I'm hoping we'll have it in main soon - Mike can
speak more to this).
Here is the issue. The intention of Alpha-3 is to conform to the
public review of the JSR-301 spec. The next release will
incorporate changes regarding the feedback we've had from the review
period - including this issue.
Reading the bug, Mike indicated that this change needed to be added
to the spec and is not a simple implementation detail.
I think that Mike raised the issue that this needs to be addressed
in the spec so
Felix Roethenbacher wrote:
What is the status of PORTLETBRIDGE-48? There is a patch available to
fix an issue with setting the character encoding.
Thanks, Felix
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge Master
1.0.0-alpha-3. This release was created in order to support the
latest JSR-301 Public Review so that it may be tested by
developers during the review process. This is still an alpha
release because there is currently no testing of the R.I.
I have applied the changes needed by PORTLETBRIDGE-51,
regenerated all of the artifacts, and deployed them to my private
Apache account ([1]). I'm am now restarting the vote for the
latest R.I.
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released,
and why..............
------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Scott
[1]
http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3
<http://people.apache.org/%7Esobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3>
Attention:
This email may contain information intended for the sole use of
the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or
disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you
believe you have received this email in error, please delete it
and notify the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily
reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd.
