Hmm..by the way, are you copying-and-pasting the JSF javadoc into myfaces classes? If so, are you sure that this is allowed? Javadoc descriptions would definitely be copyrightable, so explicit permission would be needed to place text released under the CDDL into a file licensed under the Apache license...
In Myfaces core 1.1 and 1.2 releases we have been careful to NOT copy any javadoc from the spec.. Regards, Simon >> Simon Lessard wrote: >> >>> To be more precise checkstyle whines about missing @param and @return, >>> which >>> is theoretically nice. However, JSF's JavaDoc is broken and doesn't >>> specifies those most of the time, so the question is is it better to match >>> the official API or to make checkstyle happy? >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Simon Lessard >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> It seems that checkstyle doesn't like JSF's official JavaDoc. Personally >>>> I >>>> would give higher priority to completed comments than checkstyle whining, >>>> what you guys think about it? >>>> >>>>
