That and rewriting any XML schema by hand. That was a funny one. Bruno
2008/12/9 Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hmm..by the way, are you copying-and-pasting the JSF javadoc into > myfaces classes? If so, are you sure that this is allowed? Javadoc > descriptions would definitely be copyrightable, so explicit permission > would be needed to place text released under the CDDL into a file > licensed under the Apache license... > > In Myfaces core 1.1 and 1.2 releases we have been careful to NOT copy > any javadoc from the spec.. > > Regards, > Simon > > >> Simon Lessard wrote: > >> > >>> To be more precise checkstyle whines about missing @param and @return, > >>> which > >>> is theoretically nice. However, JSF's JavaDoc is broken and doesn't > >>> specifies those most of the time, so the question is is it better to > match > >>> the official API or to make checkstyle happy? > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Simon Lessard > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> It seems that checkstyle doesn't like JSF's official JavaDoc. > Personally > >>>> I > >>>> would give higher priority to completed comments than checkstyle > whining, > >>>> what you guys think about it? > >>>> > >>>> > >
