It looks like most of the work is done with the existing archetypes. I think what would be nice:
Archetypes for each library (tomahawk, tobago, etc.) Archetypes for each library with facelets (or just have comments in the web.xml on how to convert the project to facelets) And then a different wiki with simplified instructions on using this for a bug. (hard-coded artifact and group IDs and other command line settings so that the user does not have to be asked anything). Then maybe there is a way in Jira when a new bug is being created to point the user to the wiki page? Anyone know if this is possible? -Andrew On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Simon Lessard > <simon.lessar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Definitely +1 >> >> ~ Simon >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> Just for information purposes and as start point, what we have right now >>> is this wiki page: >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFaces_Archetypes_for_Maven >>> >>> The archetypes available >>> >>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld // myfaces 1.2 + tomahawk >>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld-facelets // myfaces 1.2 + facelets + >>> tomahawk >>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld-portlets // myfaces 1.2 + portlet >>> bridge >>> myfaces-archetype-jsfcomponents // simple components in the >>> old way, the next release will use myfaces builder plugin. >>> myfaces-archetype-trinidad // myfaces 1.2 + >>> trinidad >>> >>> It could be good to know what other archetypes are useful and what other >>> wiki pages are needed, to contribute and make another release of this >>> project. >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Leonardo Uribe >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 !!! >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Robinson >>>> <andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I was wondering if we would want to create maven archetypes for >>>>> setting up trinidad, tomahawk, and other projects as a war file that >>>>> users can use to start a test case. Basically it would create a war >>>>> pom with a single page and a single managed bean with jetty support >>>>> built in so that it would be easy to modify to get going. >>>>> >>>>> By doing this and building a WIKI page we could simply point bug >>>>> reporters to the WIKI to give them instructions on how to build a >>>>> simple test case that would not be IDE or platform specific and help >>>>> with people that want to debug problems, but do not want to try each >>>>> time to extract how to reproduce a problem. >>>>> >>>>> What do you all think? >>>>> >>>>> -Andrew >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Grant Smith >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
