Another option is to reduce the work on our side and just have an SVN branch:
1) user uses SVN checkout to get the branch with the test case for the given project 2) user makes changes as needed 3) submit the test case as a zip, or better yet as "svn diff" output zipped Is that better, or do you like the archetypes approach better? On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like most of the work is done with the existing archetypes. I > think what would be nice: > > Archetypes for each library (tomahawk, tobago, etc.) > Archetypes for each library with facelets (or just have comments in > the web.xml on how to convert the project to facelets) > > And then a different wiki with simplified instructions on using this > for a bug. (hard-coded artifact and group IDs and other command line > settings so that the user does not have to be asked anything). > > Then maybe there is a way in Jira when a new bug is being created to > point the user to the wiki page? Anyone know if this is possible? > > -Andrew > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Simon Lessard >> <simon.lessar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Definitely +1 >>> >>> ~ Simon >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Just for information purposes and as start point, what we have right now >>>> is this wiki page: >>>> >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFaces_Archetypes_for_Maven >>>> >>>> The archetypes available >>>> >>>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld // myfaces 1.2 + tomahawk >>>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld-facelets // myfaces 1.2 + facelets + >>>> tomahawk >>>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld-portlets // myfaces 1.2 + portlet >>>> bridge >>>> myfaces-archetype-jsfcomponents // simple components in the >>>> old way, the next release will use myfaces builder plugin. >>>> myfaces-archetype-trinidad // myfaces 1.2 + >>>> trinidad >>>> >>>> It could be good to know what other archetypes are useful and what other >>>> wiki pages are needed, to contribute and make another release of this >>>> project. >>>> >>>> regards >>>> >>>> Leonardo Uribe >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 !!! >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Robinson >>>>> <andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I was wondering if we would want to create maven archetypes for >>>>>> setting up trinidad, tomahawk, and other projects as a war file that >>>>>> users can use to start a test case. Basically it would create a war >>>>>> pom with a single page and a single managed bean with jetty support >>>>>> built in so that it would be easy to modify to get going. >>>>>> >>>>>> By doing this and building a WIKI page we could simply point bug >>>>>> reporters to the WIKI to give them instructions on how to build a >>>>>> simple test case that would not be IDE or platform specific and help >>>>>> with people that want to debug problems, but do not want to try each >>>>>> time to extract how to reproduce a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you all think? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Andrew >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Grant Smith >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >
