I think I have a question... Is this to *force* all the subprojects to use jul ??? If so, I'll change my vote to -1
Also, I know that Tobago has a JIRA issue to use slf4j. What's wrong with them using that ? I am not sure on this vote, but if the goal is to *push* one decision to all the subprojects, I am against it... This place is about OpenSource and it is not like in a corporate world, where one guy (-> manager) has the right to push one (stupid) thing and everybody has to follow... (That's my personal take on it) -Matthias On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Gerhard Petracek<gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > short description: > this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to > java.util.logging (jul). > it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are > currently using commons-logging. > so e.g. trinidad isn't affected. details are available at [1] > > if there won't be a majority, we will open a second vote (switch from > commons-logging to slf4j). > > ------------------------------------------------ > [ ] +1 for replacing cl with jul > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 for keeping cl or to force a second vote for slf4j as replacement > ------------------------------------------------ > > regards, > gerhard > > [1] http://www.nabble.com/slf4j-and-myfaces-td23890255.html -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
