>> it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are
ok, that answers my question. >> currently using commons-logging. >> so e.g. trinidad isn't affected. details are available at [1] >> >> if there won't be a majority, we will open a second vote (switch from >> commons-logging to slf4j). >> >> ------------------------------------------------ >> [ ] +1 for replacing cl with jul >> [ ] +0 >> [X] -1 for keeping cl or to force a second vote for slf4j as replacement >> ------------------------------------------------ For Trinidad, we keep our Trinidad logger (at least I am not chaning that). The TrinidadLogger is internally using JUL, for what's worth. So I think we are fine with that, at least I hope... For core I am totally fine in using JUL, but for some reasons I don't like the corporate-ish voting style to force all the other sub-projects. (read: if tobago want's to use slf4j, why not ?) I think I will keep my +0.75 vote :-) But I am also for a more liberal debate, if some project (-> Tobago) want to use slf4j... Just my 2cents... -M >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> [1] http://www.nabble.com/slf4j-and-myfaces-td23890255.html > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
