+1 for Gerhard new suggestion. On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Gerhard Petracek < gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe we should stop the voting process > > +1 (due to several reasons) > > new suggestion: > if a sub-project would like to switch to jul, we don't need a vote (since > there is no new dependency). > if a sub-project would like to switch e.g. to slf4j, we have to vote (due > to the new logging-framework dependency). > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2009/6/15 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> > > Bernd Bohmann schrieb: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> i think many users are still using log4j in their projects. >>> Switching to jul instead of slf4j would cause more consequences for the >>> user. >>> But maybe I'm wrong. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Bernd >>> >>> Maybe we should stop the voting process for now until we have done >> further research on the implications. >> >> My personal preferrence would be simply to get rid of another pesky >> dependency instead of just switching dependencies hence I voted +1 for JUL! >> >> > -- Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=IntroductiontoGMaps4JSF
