I agree with Hazem, +1 for Gerhards suggestion. /Jan-Kees
2009/7/8 Hazem Saleh <haz...@apache.org>: > +1 for Gerhard new suggestion. > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Gerhard Petracek > <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Maybe we should stop the voting process >> >> +1 (due to several reasons) >> >> new suggestion: >> if a sub-project would like to switch to jul, we don't need a vote (since >> there is no new dependency). >> if a sub-project would like to switch e.g. to slf4j, we have to vote (due >> to the new logging-framework dependency). >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> >> 2009/6/15 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Bernd Bohmann schrieb: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> i think many users are still using log4j in their projects. >>>> Switching to jul instead of slf4j would cause more consequences for the >>>> user. >>>> But maybe I'm wrong. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Bernd >>>> >>> Maybe we should stop the voting process for now until we have done >>> further research on the implications. >>> >>> My personal preferrence would be simply to get rid of another pesky >>> dependency instead of just switching dependencies hence I voted +1 for JUL! >>> >> > > > > -- > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed > > Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): > http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 > > Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog > > [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: > http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ > http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=IntroductiontoGMaps4JSF >
