On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Matthias Wessendorf<mat...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Jan-Kees van > Andel<jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That's great. Also good that Web Beans gets ASL2 licensed, since we're >> going to depend on that one too! > > unfortunately ...
talking about WebBeans; I strongly recommend to use the bits from the OWB effort, under incubation now... -M > >> >> 2009/8/7 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: >>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jan-Kees van >>> Andel<jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hey guys, >>>> >>>> I've almost finished the Bean Validation integration. I have a working >>>> test webapp with so simple validations working. >>>> >>>> But before commit, I would like to know which Bean Validation API >>>> we're going to depend on. >>>> >>>> I'm currently using the JBoss Bean Validation binaries: >>>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/javax/validation/validation-api/1.0.CR3/ >>>> >>>> I've added the JBoss repo to the API pom as a provided dependency. >>>> >>>> The POM says it is Apache licensed, so we should be safe, right? >>> >>> yes, totally. It is really great news that JBoss is delivering more and more >>> bits under the lovely ASL 2.0 (WebBean is so too) >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jan-Kees >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
