+1 for adding that to 2.0 only. looking forward :-)
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Werner Punz<werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone. I am sort of overdue with my promised commit of the myfaces > groovy bindings, the reason simply was life itself. > > Anway to make things finally clear I want to propose following. > I want to commit the bindings this week, but I want to opt for myfaces 2.0 > instead of still going with 1.2. > > The reason simply is following: > I need to add a mechanism which allows to replace the classloader > during initialisation which means following we have to add code > to our initialisation code in our servlet context which allows this. > Now that 2.0 still is in development this is less critical than to add it to > a stable 1.2. > > And to be honest I do not want to support two versions of myfaces for the > initial stage. > So here is the deal, I will commit the codebase this week, which still has > the dirty initialisation and add the needed extensions asap in the 2.0 > codebase and I will work on make it running so that we have the extension up > and running when we hit final, sort of a goody to have > if you use myfaces. > > Werner > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
