On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Gerhard
Petracek<gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for the initial commit at [1]

why to an extension ? I'd like it to see it being part of core.

>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/scripting
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
> 2009/8/12 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have to check the method out for what it does out for now nothing is
>> done in this regard.
>>
>> My code works currently that way that over all jsf artefacts which can
>> be set via the faces-config proxies are wrapped around and the proxies
>> basically
>> dynamically reload the groovy classes if the file dates change (hence the
>> classloader).
>>
>> So what we get are dynamically reloadable beans, phase listeners,
>> etc... pretty much everything from the faces-config.
>> I am not sure how well this mixes with the new annotations.
>>
>>
>> Werner
>>
>>
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/8/11 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com>>
>>>
>>>    I dont think it will conflict, the reason for this is, I want to add
>>>    the option as web.xml override.
>>>    Which means a user who wants to use the groovy bindings has to add a
>>>    context param. If this param is not set nothing is done and the code
>>>    defaults to the code currently in existence.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Ok, I understand. In ViewDeclarationLanguage class there is a method
>>> called getScriptComponentResource. Do you have any plan to write this
>>> method, so users can write jsf components in groovy?
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>>
>>>    The groovy bindings are a plugin like extval.
>>>
>>>    Werner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
>>>
>>>        Hi
>>>
>>>        +1. I suppose this code conflict with MYFACES-2290 Add OSGi
>>>        bundle information and bundle classloader / activator, but we
>>>        can see it in deep later when we have committed this one.
>>>
>>>        regards
>>>
>>>        Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>>        2009/8/11 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org
>>>        <mailto:mat...@apache.org> <mailto:mat...@apache.org
>>>        <mailto:mat...@apache.org>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>           +1 for adding that to 2.0 only.
>>>
>>>           looking forward :-)
>>>
>>>           On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Werner
>>>        Punz<werner.p...@gmail.com <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com>
>>>           <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com
>>>        <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>            > Hello everyone. I am sort of overdue with my promised
>>>        commit of
>>>           the myfaces
>>>            > groovy bindings, the reason simply was life itself.
>>>            >
>>>            > Anway to make things finally clear I want to propose
>>>        following.
>>>            > I want to commit the bindings this week, but I want to opt
>>> for
>>>           myfaces 2.0
>>>            > instead of still going with 1.2.
>>>            >
>>>            > The reason simply is following:
>>>            > I need to add a mechanism which allows to replace the
>>>        classloader
>>>            > during initialisation which means following we have to add
>>>        code
>>>            > to our initialisation code in our servlet context which
>>>        allows this.
>>>            > Now that 2.0 still is in development this is less critical
>>>        than
>>>           to add it to
>>>            > a stable 1.2.
>>>            >
>>>            > And to be honest I do not want to support two versions of
>>>        myfaces
>>>           for the
>>>            > initial stage.
>>>            > So here is the deal, I will commit the codebase this week,
>>>        which
>>>           still has
>>>            > the dirty initialisation and add the needed extensions asap
>>> in
>>>           the 2.0
>>>            > codebase and I will work on make it running so that we
>>>        have the
>>>           extension up
>>>            > and running when we hit final, sort of a goody to have
>>>            > if you use myfaces.
>>>            >
>>>            > Werner
>>>            >
>>>            >
>>>            >
>>>            >
>>>            >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>           --
>>>           Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>>           blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>           sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>           twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to