+1 for JUL

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 17:02, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for JUL
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
> <jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 for JUL.
>>
>> Jan-Kees van Andel
>>
>>
>> 2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>:
>>> +1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't
>>> require any dependencies.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +1 java.util.logging.Logger
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Concini <mconc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1 for JUL
>>>>>
>>>>> Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/10/1 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why don't you consider using SLF4J?
>>>>>>>> Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try
>>>>>>>> anyway :-D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That would be a dependency replacement with another.
>>>>>>> Just my personal opinion regarding SLF4J
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't bother, I noticed that there is a bridge with which you can use
>>>>>> JUL messages with SLF4J:
>>>>>> http://www.slf4j.org/legacy.html
>>>>>> For a "library" like MyFaces makes perfectly sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Grant Smith
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>

Reply via email to