+1 for JUL On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel <jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for JUL. > > Jan-Kees van Andel > > > 2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>: >> +1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't >> require any dependencies. >> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> +1 java.util.logging.Logger >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Concini <mconc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> +1 for JUL >>>> >>>> Antonio Petrelli wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 2009/10/1 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why don't you consider using SLF4J? >>>>>>> Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try >>>>>>> anyway :-D >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That would be a dependency replacement with another. >>>>>> Just my personal opinion regarding SLF4J >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Don't bother, I noticed that there is a bridge with which you can use >>>>> JUL messages with SLF4J: >>>>> http://www.slf4j.org/legacy.html >>>>> For a "library" like MyFaces makes perfectly sense. >>>>> >>>>> Antonio >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Grant Smith >>> >> >
-- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
