I thought the release files should do.
Why would building from the TAG make any difference?
What do you mean with "java security is not a
2.0 specific issue"? Shouldn't the release
contain all files needed to replace Mojarras
api+impl?
Best regards,
Ganesh
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
have you tried building it from the TAG ?
the java security is not a 2.0 specific issue
-Matthias
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote:
Hi,
Maybe some of the required jars aren't included with this beta?
This is where I took the beta from:
http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200betabinsrc/binaries/
I used the jars contained in the lib folder of:
http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200betabinsrc/binaries/myfaces-core-2.0.0-beta-bin.zip
to replace Mojarra, no other jars are on my classpath, I'm running tomcat
6.0.20.
Best regards,
Ganesh
Ganesh schrieb:
Hi,
I've tried testing the beta with DojoFaces, but even the most basic
examples fail to work, e.g.:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html";
xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core";
xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets";>
<body>
<h:form>
<h:commandButton value="test" />
</h:form>
</body>
</html>
gives me:
java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: Cannot find any provider
supporting DES/ECB/PKCS5Padding
I'm all in favour of another alpha, but I feel people won't give much
credit if a beta doesn't do the basic stuff.
Best regards,
Ganesh
Cagatay Civici schrieb:
Anyway my vote is 0 now and I would like to hear other testers' results.
