-hi, has one checked what Trinidad is offering for that ? I mean the code is pretty old (and therefore stable). Also at Oracle there is quite some PREF testing done...
-Matthias On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Created MYFACES-2538 Remove resourceVersion and libraryVersion from resource > identifiers. > > regards, > > Leonardo Uribe > > 2010/2/5 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> >> >> Hi >> >> Yes, that one is a big problem. There is no way to "traverse" a jar file >> without iterating over all entries to get the library version and resource >> version. That means the current algorithm do that all times a resource is >> rendered. This is really bad. >> >> I remember someone commented that on jsr-314-open at jcp.org mailing list, >> and checking the latest ri code (2.0.2-b10), library and resource version >> feature was removed. It seems a decision was taken there. >> >> Checking more, the topic describing this is: >> >> [jsr-314-open] Need guidance: invalid assumptions in design of resource >> versioning feature >> >> We should change our algorithm too to prevent this performance problem. >> >> regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2010/2/5 Martin Koci <martin.k...@aura.cz> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> during profiling YourKitProfiler always marks >>> >>> org.apache.myfaces.resource.ClassLoaderResourceLoader.getLibraryVersion(String) >>> as hotspot - that method always takes 30--50% CPU time per one >>> request/response. Is it a known problem? I will provide more information >>> later. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Martin Kočí >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
