FYI, it still does occur with JSF2, at least on the JSF2 AJAX branch we have. It results in a nice NullPointerException on the server actually, very ugly.
-Andrew On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Max Starets <max.star...@oracle.com> wrote: > Mathias, > > I agree that we should do something about TRINIDAD-943. > > The discussion you pointed out does indeed show a workable solution > (http://www.mail-archive.com/us...@myfaces.apache.org/msg53577.html) - > the idea is that you would have a filter that would check: > > Check if the current request is a Trinidad PPR request > If it is, and there is no existing user HTTP Session, write out a redirect > response and do not invoke the filter chain. > > It is somewhat of a hack of course... > > Max > > Mathias Walter wrote: > > Hi, > > one of the most frustration things with Trinidad (IMHO) is the > ViewExpiredException occurring if a session times out and a user invokes an > ajax action. > > I found no solution to overcome this problem, since two years. There is also > a critical bug reported in JIRA at February, 2008: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-943. But there is no progress > on the bug. > > Last year I found a discussion at > http://www.mail-archive.com/us...@myfaces.apache.org/msg53574.html and added > this link to the JIRA issue. I also tried to implement the proposed solution > but was not able to do that. > > In one of my projects I'm using JBoss Seam. Seam can handle the > ViewExpiredException, but Trinidad not. > > I was wondering why there is no progress on the bug. How do other developers > handle this exception? Since ajax is everywhere, and there are a lot of > projects based on Trinidad, the error must be seriously. But I never got an > error message on other AJAX-based websites. They already function, but my > application not. > > Maybe I did something wrong with the configuration files or I missed some > documentation. > > Please help me to fix this notorious and annoying bug. > > BTW: Does this problem will occur with JSF 2.0 or is it covered by the spec? > > -- > Kind regards, > Mathias > > >
