These two revisions cause the problem: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=933814 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=933812
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > Yesterday I mentioned the same, on trunk > > I am on Linux, Werner is on OS X. > Jakob/Leo: r u windoze ? > > Thx, > Matthias > > PS: I changed the subject to not hijack the vote ;-) > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Before I am giving my vote here, there is still a unit test failure ... >> >> >> Am 15.04.10 06:39, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks for running this >>> >>> Sent from my iPod. >>> >>> On 15.04.2010, at 03:48, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> 2010/4/14 Leonardo Uribe < <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>lu4...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.0 release of Apache >>>> MyFaces core out. >>>> >>>> Minor fixes were done since the latest proposed artifacts >>>> (MYFACES-2658, MYFACES-2659 and MYFACES-2660), so we can >>>> continue with the vote. >>>> >>>> The artifacts passed all TCK tests. >>>> >>>> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts: >>>> 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.1 [1] >>>> 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.0 [1] >>>> 3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" v1.0.0-beta-3 [1] >>>> >>>> The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and >>>> [3] for binary and source packages). >>>> >>>> The release notes could be found at [4]. >>>> >>>> Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with >>>> myfaces-api. >>>> >>>> Please take a look at the "2.0.0" artifacts and vote! >>>> >>>> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three >>>> +1 votes (see [3]). >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------ >>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be >>>> released, >>>> and why.............. >>>> ------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Leonardo Uribe >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200>http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200 >>>> [2] >>>> >>>> <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >>>> [3] >>>> >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200binsrc>http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200binsrc >>>> [4] >>>> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890 >>>> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
