Hey Jan,

these two new methods:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=933814
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=933812

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
<jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just runned the build on Windows Vista x64:
>
> D:\dev\work\myfaces2\core_2_0_0>mvn --version
> Maven version: 2.0.10
> Java version: 1.6.0_14
> OS name: "windows vista" version: "6.0" arch: "amd64" Family: "windows"
>
> The tests worked fine.
>
> @Matthias: Can you see which test method is causing the issue and which
> assertion fails (or which exception is thrown)?
>
> /JK
>
>
>
>
> 2010/4/15 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
>>
>> that's funny :-)
>>
>> What JDK ? 1.5 ?
>>
>> I am on 1.6.x
>> =>
>> mat...@woody:~/work/source/Apache/myfaces/trunk$ mvn -v
>> Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 21:16:01+0200)
>> Java version: 1.6.0_13
>> Java home: /java/jdk1.6.0_13/jre
>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>> OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.31-19-generic" arch: "i386" Family: "unix"
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > In my machine works fine. I compiled sources on both Linux and Windows.
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > Leonardo Uribe
>> >
>> > 2010/4/15 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
>> >>
>> >> These two revisions cause the problem:
>> >>
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=933814
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=933812
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> <mat...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Yesterday I mentioned the same, on trunk
>> >> >
>> >> > I am on Linux, Werner is on OS X.
>> >> > Jakob/Leo: r u windoze ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thx,
>> >> > Matthias
>> >> >
>> >> > PS: I changed the subject to not hijack the vote ;-)
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Before I am giving my vote here, there is still a unit test failure
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Am 15.04.10 06:39, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> +1
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks for running this
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Sent from my iPod.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 15.04.2010, at 03:48, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> +1
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> 2010/4/14 Leonardo Uribe <
>> >> >>>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>lu4...@gmail.com
>> >> >>>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    Hi,
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.0 release of
>> >> >>>> Apache
>> >> >>>>    MyFaces core out.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    Minor fixes were done since the latest proposed artifacts
>> >> >>>>    (MYFACES-2658, MYFACES-2659 and MYFACES-2660), so we can
>> >> >>>>    continue with the vote.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
>> >> >>>>    1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.1 [1]
>> >> >>>>    2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.0 [1]
>> >> >>>>    3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" v1.0.0-beta-3
>> >> >>>> [1]
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]
>> >> >>>> and
>> >> >>>>    [3] for binary and source packages).
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    The release notes could be found at [4].
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
>> >> >>>>    myfaces-api.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    Please take a look at the "2.0.0" artifacts and vote!
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of
>> >> >>>> three
>> >> >>>>    +1 votes (see [3]).
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    ------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>>>    [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> >> >>>>    [ ] +0
>> >> >>>>    [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> >> >>>>    released,
>> >> >>>>    and why..............
>> >> >>>>    ------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    Thanks,
>> >> >>>>    Leonardo Uribe
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>    [1]
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>  <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200>http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200
>> >> >>>>    [2]
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>  <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>> >> >>>>    [3]
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>  <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200binsrc>http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200binsrc
>> >> >>>>    [4]
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> >
>> >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>
>> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to