yep, that's right. Apache 2 license On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Martinconi Cosmin <cosmin.martinc...@codebeat.ro> wrote: > Hi Leonardo, > > Thanks for the feedback. Yes, as far as I saw it's ASL v2 licensed, so it > should be no problem > regarding this. > > Regards, > Cosmin > > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> What license is Arquillian? >> >> It is some kind of GPL or LGPL you should read this link: >> >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >> >> Looking some source files of that project it seems it is Apache License v >> 2.0, so it is ok. >> >> I'll take a look at your proposal. >> >> regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2010/6/5 Martinconi Cosmin <cosmin.martinc...@codebeat.ro> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've started working on my GSoC project "Automated webapp tests for >>> MyFaces core and extensions", >>> and the first target of the project is to create an testing API that will >>> be used for the project's testing of >>> MyFaces core, and if required for any extensions. >>> >>> For this after some studying and discussions I proposed Arquillian as a >>> framework in order to be integrated >>> into the API. Other frameworks that I considered are HTTPUnit and Canoo >>> WebTest. >>> >>> What do you think about Arquillian, any other ideas, should we reconsider >>> another framework? The scope >>> of the API is to be used for MyFaces core, bot also for any extension and >>> application testing that is needed. >>> >>> For more reference regarding my GSoC proposal and Arquillian >>> documentation you can check out: >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/GSoC2010_AutomatedTests >>> http://docs.jboss.org/arquillian/reference/latest/en-US/html_single/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> Cosmin >> > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf