I haven't and wont look at the mojarra code but I think you are looking for
org.apache.myfaces.config.annotation.LifecycleProvider Geronimo has been trying to get everyone to standardize on this style of interface as it lets the implementor support constructor injection transparently. Geronimo's implementations of this use xbean-reflect which provides a handy way to stuff in all the properties and get a fully configured object back. thanks david jencks On Aug 5, 2010, at 5:12 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Somehow I think there was already work/discussion about it, based on a > Tomcat interface. > It for sure does bring back some fragile memory. Let me think... > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >> Well, looking at the RI is for sure not OK. >> >> I didn't see a problem with the previous provided links (the JBoss >> code), however >> I have not opened any of the provided links yet. >> >> -Matthias >> >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:54 PM, <ssilv...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> That's OK. I guess I can do the SPI implementations on my end but it might >>> not make it into JBoss AS6 GA. Let's concentrate on the MyFaces SPI's for >>> now. How does MyFaces handle the SPI's like Mojarra has? I'm sure it's OK >>> to look at Mojarra code since it's GPL2, right? If not, you can look at >>> JavaDoc. We need something similar to: >>> >>> com.sun.faces.spi.InjectionProvider >>> https://mojarra.dev.java.net/source/browse/mojarra/trunk/jsf-ri/src/main/java/com/sun/faces/spi/InjectionProvider.java >>> >>> com.sun.faces.spi.AnnotationProvider >>> https://mojarra.dev.java.net/source/browse/mojarra/trunk/jsf-ri/src/main/java/com/sun/faces/spi/AnnotationProvider.java >>> >>> Stan >>> >>> Quoting Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: >>> >>>> At Apache we can not have code that contains (L)GPL code; or depends on >>>> it. >>>> >>>> We had discussion(s) about this in the past. The below link contains >>>> references >>>> to other (Apache) documents: >>>> >>>> http://markmail.org/message/qtc4g6vsracgzbok >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel >>>> <jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Great news! It would be very nice if JBoss ships with MyFaces 2. This >>>>> also >>>>> opens up possibilities to do some enhancements to increase developer >>>>> productivity in JBoss, like better resource reloading and so on. Or doing >>>>> some things more efficient by plugging into the JBoss infrastructure. >>>>> Just >>>>> thinking out loud... :) >>>>> >>>>> One thing about the JBoss SVN link Stan sent. I took a quick peek at the >>>>> license header in a Java file and saw that it's LGPL licensed. AFAIK, >>>>> this >>>>> is not compatible with ASL, so I suggest to not look at the code while >>>>> implementing the stuff Stan asked for. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Jan-Kees >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2010/8/5 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Stan, >>>>>> >>>>>> welcome back. We do understand that you can not make any promise on that >>>>>> topic. >>>>>> The fact that some folks at JBoss are thinking about shipping MyFaces >>>>>> (as an alternative option) >>>>>> is a good news for this entire community here. Especially it is a >>>>>> great motivation for the >>>>>> folks that did the main work on ensuring Apache MyFaces 2.x is a great >>>>>> success. >>>>>> >>>>>> On the missing pieces: I am sure that there will be some interested in >>>>>> working on them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>> PMC Chair Apache MyFaces >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:42 PM, <ssilv...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would you like to see MyFaces Core ship with JBoss AS6? If so, read >>>>>>> on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you've been around MyFaces awhile, you probably remember that >>>>>>> JBoass >>>>>>> AS >>>>>>> used to ship with MyFaces instead of Mojarra. It was regrettable, but >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> the time Mojarra was far ahead spec-wise and the powers that be >>>>>>> decided >>>>>>> my >>>>>>> time would be better spent integrating Mojarra instead of improving >>>>>>> MyFaces. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However, with JBoss AS6 M4, this is no longer an "either or" >>>>>>> proposition. >>>>>>> Both MyFaces and Mojarra can live side-by-side. The application can >>>>>>> decide >>>>>>> which implementation to use: >>>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JSFonJBossAS6 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's more, changing the default JSF implementation for AS6 is just a >>>>>>> matter of changing the defaultJSFConfig property in an XML file. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've talked internally at JBoss about adding MyFaces to the JBoss AS >>>>>>> community distribution. Some were for it, and some were very, very >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> it. >>>>>>> Nobody so far is against it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The good part is that I don't think it's a lot of work. It's probably >>>>>>> just >>>>>>> three or four classes that implement SPI's that I'm guessing MyFaces >>>>>>> already >>>>>>> has. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So this is where the MyFaces Dev group comes in. MyFaces Core 2.0 >>>>>>> will >>>>>>> run >>>>>>> OK on JBoss AS6 right now. However, there is some integration work >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> needed for full JEE5 and JEE6 compliance. We need: >>>>>>> * An injection provider SPI similar to Mojarra's >>>>>>> com.sun.faces.spi.InjectionProvider. >>>>>>> * The JBoss/MyFaces implementation of the SPI. I expect this will be >>>>>>> very >>>>>>> similar to >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> org.jboss.web.jsf.integration.injection.JBossDelegatingInjectionProvider. >>>>>>> * An AnnotationProvider SPI similar to Mojarra's >>>>>>> com.sun.faces.spi.AnnotationProvider. >>>>>>> * A JBoss/MyFaces implementation of the SPI similar to >>>>>>> org.jboss.web.jsf.integration.config.JBossAnnotationProvider. >>>>>>> * A ServletContextListener class to call for initialization. I expect >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> will extend from MyFacesServletContextListener and be very similar to >>>>>>> org.jboss.web.jsf.integration.config.JBossMojarra20ConfigureListener. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If MyFaces Dev decides to take this on, then the code will probably >>>>>>> live >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> Apache and I'll bring it into JBoss AS using Maven. I don't have time >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> write and maintain the code myself but I'm happy to help out with >>>>>>> guidance >>>>>>> and to do some refactoring of my code to make this easier. BTW, the >>>>>>> JBoss/Mojarra integration code lives here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-jsf-int/trunk/jboss-faces/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lastly, let me say that I can't make hard promises right now. I don't >>>>>>> know >>>>>>> if someone at JBoss/RedHat will come along and nix the idea. However, >>>>>>> even >>>>>>> if we can't ship MyFaces you will have all the integration points >>>>>>> ready >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> have an easy way to "drop in" MyFaces whenever you want to use it with >>>>>>> JBoss >>>>>>> AS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WDYT?? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>> >>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
