Hi, What do you guys think about pruning the SVN keywords in the source files?
Matthias pointed out a nice example of an issue you run into with this stuff. 1 Not everybody has (the same) svn:keywords on every file. 2 When 1, it will get out of sync. 3 Unreadable version numbers are pretty useless information (at least for me). 4 If you need to know something about the revision history, SVN itself is a much better place to look. 5 (I think) it looks messy in the source code. Note that I'm not talking about removing everything in a major refactoring. For now, I'm just proposing a convention for new code. I'm also not proposing to remove the @author JavaDoc tag. That's a useful one. I'm talking about the "latest modification by $Author" and "@version $Revision: 799929 $ $Date:.......$" stuff. What do you guys think? Regards, Jan-Kees 2010/8/9 Jan-Kees van Andel <jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> > Yeah, I know. I'm so quick. I can edit files back in time. ;-) > > /JK > > > 2010/8/9 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > > + * @author Leonardo Uribe (latest modification by $Author: jankeesvanandel >> $) >> >> + * @version $Revision: 799929 $ $Date: 2009-08-01 16:29:33 -0500 >> (sáb, 01 ago 2009) $ >> >> >> >> did you copy that into your IDE template for new files? :-) >> >> -M >> >> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Stan >> > >> > I have attached a proposal for this issue on: >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2860 >> > >> > It includes the patch to be applied on myfaces, the project created to >> do >> > the integration, and the jsf deployer used in JBoss AS6 to give a try. >> > >> > It could be good to know what do yo think about it. >> > >> > best regards, >> > >> > Leonardo Uribe >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >
