My vote is 'start a new vote and declare that 1.0.13 will be the last release'

-Matthias

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Bernd.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2010/11/24 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com>:
>> Hello
>>
>> I would prefer to start a new vote and declare hat 1.0.13 will be the
>> last release.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> Looks like the Trinidad community failed to get a proper release out.
>>> It's because nobody here cares about JSF 1.1 that much, which makes sense.
>>>
>>> But a few users are _still_ on that JSF version, hence I wanted to get
>>> a new maintenance release out.
>>>
>>> What should we do with Trinidad 1.0.x ?
>>>
>>> * start a new vote and declare that 1.0.13 will be the last release ?
>>> * don't even bother in releasing Trinidad 1.0.13 ?
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Blake,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for voting. Together with my vote, we got two votes.
>>>>
>>>> This is means there will be NO Trinidad 1.0.13 release. Too bad that
>>>> the community
>>>> is not really interested in even getting maintaining releases out :-(
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Blake Sullivan
>>>> <blake.sulli...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Blake Sullivan
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/14/10 9:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> sent from my Android phone
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 10, 2010 2:07 PM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the next release of the Apache
>>>>>> MyFaces Trinidad 1.0.x CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to a
>>>>>> staging repo ([1]).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please take a look at the "1.0.13" artifacts and vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>>>> and why..............
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-055/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jakob Korherr
>
> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
> work: http://www.irian.at
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to