currently codi uses a profile for activating it for nightly builds (see [1]).
regards, gerhard [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> > This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code. > Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of > tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to > commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be > calculated. > > What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could > only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything > else to be unknown.. > > Scott > > On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff <mat...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher > > <rdebussc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Matthias, > >> > >> Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile > >> apache-release? > > > > it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always > > from a TAG, > > hence the revision is known. > > > >> > >> It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client > >> installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company > >> projects. > > > > I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one. > > > > -Matthias > > > >> > >> regards > >> Rudy. > >> > >> > >> On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello Matze, > >>> > >>> good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set > >>> to 'unkown'. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Bernd > >>> > >>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < > mat...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Downloaded the source: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip > >>>> > >>>> did an unzip and "mvn clean install" > >>>> > >>>> I am getting this "error": > >>>> [INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}] > >>>> [INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped. > >>>> [INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped. > >>>> [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd > >>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api && > >>>> svn --non-interactive info > >>>> [INFO] Working directory: > >>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api > >>>> Provider message: > >>>> The svn command failed. > >>>> Command output: > >>>> svn: '.' is not a working copy > >>>> > >>>> [INFO] > >>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > >>>> [INFO] > >>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>> [INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository : > >>>> Error! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that should > >>>> be really _always_ enabled... > >>>> > >>>> Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target > >>>> folder (of my unzip) is (of course) > >>>> not "SVN folder". > >>>> > >>>> Any hints? > >>>> > >>>> -Matthias > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > >>>>>> [ ] +0 > >>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be > >>>>>> released, > >>>>>> and why.............. > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Scott > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hey all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 > >>>>>>> release > >>>>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or > not. > >>>>>>> This > >>>>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all > >>>>>>> of the > >>>>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable > >>>>>>> testing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for > review. > >>>>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the > >>>>>>> JIRA > >>>>>>> site [2] for review as well. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Scott O'Bryan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to > NEXUS, > >>>>>>> so a > >>>>>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/ > >>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092 > > > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Matthias Wessendorf > >>>> > >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
