+1

On 15 April 2011 09:51, Werner Punz <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Am 15.04.11 01:08, schrieb Scott O'Bryan:
>
>  Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0 release out and
>> now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have
>> committed the recent submitted patches available for this release and it
>> has undergone some considerable testing. As per an email discussion [1],
>> it was decided to take Trinidad out of beta and move it to an official
>> release.
>>
>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of the
>> following should be ready for review:
>>
>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [2]
>> * The generated source archive [3]
>> * The updated svn repository [4]
>>
>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>> and why..............
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott O'Bryan
>>
>> [1] http://old.nabble.com/-Trinidad--Release-schedule-td31297285.html
>> [2]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-094/
>> [3]
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-094/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0/trinidad-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>>
>> [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.0
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to