Nope.. +1. ;) Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: Am I too late? +1 On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Bruno Aranda <brunoara...@gmail.com>wrote: > +1 > > > On 15 April 2011 09:51, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Am 15.04.11 01:08, schrieb Scott O'Bryan: >> >> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0 release out and >>> now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have >>> committed the recent submitted patches available for this release and it >>> has undergone some considerable testing. As per an email discussion [1], >>> it was decided to take Trinidad out of beta and move it to an official >>> release. >>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of the >>> following should be ready for review: >>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [2] >>> * The generated source archive [3] >>> * The updated svn repository [4] >>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following: >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------ >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, >>> and why.............. >>> ------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Scott O'Bryan >>> >>> [1] http://old.nabble.com/-Trinidad--Release-schedule-td31297285.html >>> [2] >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-094/ >>> [3] >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-094/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0/trinidad-2.0.0-source-release.zip >>> >>> [4] >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.0 >>> >>> >> >> >
