Hi, > Mhh why is the project not hosted on apache extras which would be the > perfect place for now?
Since there is no restriction for source code repositories from Google, I left this choice to the student (Jan), and he preferred assembla.com. However, it would totally be fine to move it to myfaces/gsoc in the near future. Regards, Jakob 2011/10/20 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>: > Mhh why is the project not hosted on apache extras which would be the > perfect place for now? > > Werner > > > Am 10/20/11 9:41 AM, schrieb Gerhard Petracek: >> >> hi mark, >> >> manila is the next generation of myfaces webapp-test. >> you already mentioned one of the restrictions/issues of myfaces >> webapp-test and that's the reason why we don't have a release (with >> manila "everything" would change in the release afterwards). >> >> manila solves most of the known issues and should replace webapp-test >> "v1" as soon as we know that the approach of manila works in ci-servers. >> imo we should test it before we move the code to apache, because it's >> useless for us if there are basic issues (esp. in combination with >> jenkins). >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> 2011/10/20 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>> >> >> Hi folks! >> >> We now have 2 GSOC test projects which are based on Arquillian: >> >> a.) gsoc/webtest [1] which got implemented last year and is already >> in our SVN (but not yet released) and >> >> b.) gsoc/manila [2] which is not yet granted to the ASF (or is it?) >> >> What is the state of both projects? >> >> If I understood them correctly both cover the same areas (at least >> partly). >> >> Oh yes, and having to write something like: >> @WebappDependency.List >> ({ >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core:myfaces-extcdi-core-api:jar:1.0.2-SNAPSHOT"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core:myfaces-extcdi-core-impl:jar:1.0.2-SNAPSHOT"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.modules:myfaces-extcdi-jsf20-module-api:jar:1.0.2-SNAPSHOT"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.modules:myfaces-extcdi-jsf20-module-impl:jar:1.0.2-SNAPSHOT"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.modules:myfaces-extcdi-message-module-api:jar:1.0.2-SNAPSHOT"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.modules:myfaces-extcdi-message-module-impl:jar:1.0.2-SNAPSHOT"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-impl:jar:1.1.0"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-spi:jar:1.1.0"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-jsf:jar:1.1.0"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-resource:jar:1.1.0"), >> >> >> @WebappDependency("org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-web:jar:1.1.0"), >> @WebappDependency("javassist:javassist:jar:3.12.0.GA >> <http://3.12.0.ga/>"), >> @WebappDependency("net.sf.scannotation:scannotation:jar:1.0.2") >> }) >> >> >> in a test Java class is an absolute no-go for me! This is terribly >> to maintain and will way too often be broken... >> >> >> Such things must NOT be part of any test class! >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/gsoc/webapptest >> >> [2]http://subversion.assembla.com/svn/manila/trunk >> >> > > > -- Jakob Korherr blog: http://www.jakobk.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr work: http://www.irian.at
