+1 from me also. Sounds like a very good plan. LieGrue, strub
----- Original Message ----- > From: Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> > To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org> > Cc: > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 10:22 PM > Subject: Re: [TRINIDAD] Some status > > Hi > > +1, sounds good. Maybe we should think about use other code highlight > library with a license compatible with apache, but make a release > comes first, so this should not be an stopper for that. > > regards, > > Leonardo Uribe > > 2011/11/14 Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com>: >> Okay everyone, >> >> In case you were wondering of the status of Trinidad, here's where we > are >> at. There have been some major hurdles with JSF 2.0 and 2.1 that we have >> been cleaning up (and my schedule has been tight as a result). Furthermore >> we had a licensing issue with the Component Showcase which prevented the >> release of Trinidad 2.0.1. >> >> So I'm going to try to get a release out this week and here is what I >> propose: >> >> 1. I'm going to disable the Component Showcase from being distributed > as >> part of our builds. It will still be available in the source, but not as a >> distributable. This will prevent us from distributing stuff with the LGPL >> liscense (thanks for catching this guys). >> >> 2. I'm going to sync up the Trinidad 2.0.1 tag with what's > currently in >> Trunk. A lot of high priority issues came in and were fixed shortly after >> the licensing issue was discovered and so I held off on the release of >> Trinidad 2.0.1 until we could get these addressed and things had > stabilized. >> It looks like they have a bit so I'm thinking the trunk would make a > good >> 2.0.1 release rather then what is currently in the tag. >> >> 3. I'd like the change the trunk to become Trinidad 2.1.0 to reflect > our >> Faces 2.1 work. JSF 2.1 will be the bottom dependency for that branch. > The >> current 2.0.x branch would be moved to the branches for further bug fixing >> and stuff (much like we did with 2.0 and 1.2). >> >> Please respond to this over the next day or so, so that I can get a feel > for >> what the community believes is best. :) >> >> Scott >> >