I've cleaned up all of these files.  Trunk builds and passes rat, so a
new release candidate should pass rat as well.

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry.  -1
>
> Rat shows that we have several non-trivial files that are missing headers:
>
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pss/acid/resources/testComposite/dynComp_1.xhtml
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pss/acid/resources/testComposite/dynComp_3.xhtml
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pss/acid/resources/testComposite/dynComp_4.xhtml
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pss/acid/resources/testComposite/dynComp_2.xhtml
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pss/acid/resources/testComposite/dynComp_7.xhtml
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pool/resources/testComposite/dynComp_1.xhtml
>
> The rest of these files are not blockers, but are also showing up in
> rat, which makes evaluating a release take much longer.   Can we add
> headers to them?  We could also add them to the exclude list, but if
> the contents changed to be non-trivial, then we'd need a license
> anyway, so it's safer to add the license, and each of these file
> formats supports license comments.
>
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/application/contracts/contracts/red/mylib/myjs.js
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pool/resources/test1.js
>   
> impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pool/resources/test.js
>   impl/src/test/resources/META-INF/contracts/yellow/javax.faces.contract.xml
>   impl/src/test/resources/META-INF/contracts/yellow/mylib/myjs.js
>   impl/src/test/resources/META-INF/contracts/blue/javax.faces.contract.xml
>   impl/src/test/resources/META-INF/contracts/blue/mylib/myjs.js
>
> These files needs to be put in the rat exclusions section as I'm
> fairly certain they do not support having a license in them, and they
> are trivial.
>
>   
> impl/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/javax.enterprise.inject.spi.Extension
>   
> impl/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.myfaces.spi.InjectionProvider
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
>> MyFaces core out.
>>
>> The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
>>
>> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
>>  1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.2.2  [1]
>>  2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.2.3  [1]
>>
>> The artifacts were deployed on nexus repo [1] and to my private
>> Apache account [3] for binary and source packages.
>>
>> The release notes could be found at [4].
>>
>> Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with myfaces-api.
>>
>> Please take a look at the "2.2.3" artifacts and vote!
>>
>> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
>> +1 votes (see [3]).
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>  and why..............
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1018/org/apache/myfaces/
>>     
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1017/org/apache/myfaces/
>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>> [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces223binsrc
>> [4] 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12326543

Reply via email to