Hey Markus! How are you doing? Yes, In fact our Nordic drivers are a wraparound to the manufacturer's drivers. So what is happening is [mynewt driver]--->[nordic driver]--->[nordic hal]. Is this optimal? No, but it works because Nordic works out every workaround for any possible hw/hal bug. This allows us to have a driver which works for all nRF52xxx chips. I wouldn't oppose to have the same going on with STM(despite the fact that I don't know much about their hw/libs). I think a good person to ask this is Fabio Utzig, I believe he has some experience with these boards and he's aware of how STM hw works. :)
Best Regards, Miguel On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 5:27 PM, markus <mar...@bibi.ca> wrote: > I have a PWM implementation for the STM32 (currently F3 & F7) but I'm > not happy with it - which is why there currently is no PR. > > Most of what I want to change is the use of the backend library, using > the LL api instead of HAL. All STM32 bindings I could find in mynewt are > based on the HAL library ... > > Is it acceptable to base a peripheral library on the LL api or is that > not something to be done in mynewt? > > Have fun, > Markus -- -- Miguel Azevedo
