On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 09:05:58AM +1100, Justin Mclean wrote: > > The rest of them are from files which contain the Apache license text at > > the top of the file. In these files, we retained the original copyright > > notice below the Apache license. Do you think this is problematic? > > That's incorrect.while you can license the whole as Apache, each file > needs to keep their original header and not have two headers. > > The only case where this might come up is if we’re heavily modified > the file in question.
OK, thanks for the heads up. Is this something we should deal with immediately, or can we fix it between now and our next release? > Other than the above issue is it in a state that I can take another look? Yes, I believe so. Thanks again! Chris
