I get it, sure. But now it looks more like a template than a concrete schedule.
But, sure, I get it, now that I get it. Gj On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 13:53, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, 12:01 Geertjan Wielenga, <geert...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Also, I believe the mentions of 12.1 should be removed here, i.e., in the > > Release column in the table, there should now only be 11.x, if I'm right? > > > > Why? The idea was to demonstrate how the same schedule could work from year > to year. Maybe that could be clarified? > > Best wishes, > > Neil >
