On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 14:16, Eric Barboni <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the template, I would prefer a complicated vote that make people aware > of all the stuff we release as PMC.
I'm still not totally sold on doing that instead of multiple vote threads, but we do need to be clearer on all the stuff we release, and what we expect everyone to actually check before voting. With more thought, I'm veering towards Laszlo's suggestion of adding binary zip and nbms into release vote, and separate votes on the other artefacts. This also reflects different OS concerns, additional build processes, and different people signing. > So maybe if we have only one PMC who check os installer is still releasable > by the trust of others. Well, I'd been pushing for something closer to that when this was first discussed! ;-) However, if we are going to have votes on binaries, then I think we need to go with 72hrs and min 3 +1 for every artefact just like any other ASF vote. Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
